HOLLOWAY'S OINTMENT JAR FRAGMENT

c. 1860
Subcollections
Overview

Fragment of Holloway's Ointment jar (base) found during earthworks associated with Newcastle Gaol in 2008.
All that remains of the ceramic jar is half of the base and a portion of the wall.
However a portion of the black text design is still visible. "...eterate ulcers / ...Breasts Sore Heads / RHEUNATISN / ...2/9 4/6 1/22/ & 33 Each / BY THE PROPRIETOR / 244 STRAND LONDON".
The object is incomplete, chipped and dirty with staining on the inside surface.

Historical information

The fragment was found at the Newcastle Gaol during excavations in 2008 associated with earthworks to counter rising damp. The fragment is composed of ceramic and would have measured roughly 3.5 cm across the base. All that remains of the jar is half of the base and a portion of the wall, however a fragmented description is still visible. From this description is has been determined that the fragment is from a Holloways Ointmentjar, an opium-based medicine produced in large quantities between1837-1931 and sold across the English-speaking world. The design of this jar dates back to the late 1860s and originally read Holloways Ointment. For the cure of inveterate ulcers. Sore legs sore breasts sore heads. Gout and Rheumatism. Pots 1/1d 2/9 4/6 1/22/&33 each. By the proprietor 244 Strand London.
While popular, the ointment was widely derided as quackery and snake oil.

Details

Details

Registration number
cwa-org-37-2012.17
Item type
Material
Width
3.5000 cm
Contextual Information

The fragment is from a “Holloway’s Ointment” jar, an opium-based medicine produced in large quantities between 1837-1931 and sold across the English-speaking world. The design of this jar dates back to the late 1860s and originally read “Holloway’s Ointment. For the cure of inveterate ulcers. Sore legs sore breasts sore heads. Gout and Rheumatism. Pots 1/1d 2/9 4/6 1/22/&33 each. By the proprietor 244 Strand London.”
While popular, the ointment was widely derided as quackery and snake oil.

Year
Statement of significance

The value of the item considered for accession lies in its association with its relative representativeness and rarity. As an incomplete fragment this item is no longer a good representative of a ceramic jar (Holloways or otherwise), however the late 1860s design of Holloways ointment is considered to be quite rare. While the fragment has been removed from its original archaeological context it still directly relates to the history of the Newcastle Gaol building. As such, is desirable to have the item accessioned into the museum collection.

Primary significance criteria
Historic significance
Permissions

photographic images CC BY 4.0 Phil Hart

Attribution requirements

Photo by Phil Hart

Shire of Toodyay

Shire of Toodyay

Organisation Details
View Collection
Item Feedback

Scan this QR code to open this page on your phone ->